Banner
You are here: Home Downlight Down Lighter Thermal Management with Simulation Case Study
Down Lighter Thermal Management with Simulation Case Study PDF Print E-mail
Saturday, 03 December 2011 18:37

How Difficult Can LED Lighting Be?  
LED lighting can be an effective method to reduce the operating cost of a building. However, unlike traditional lighting solutions, LEDs have a maximum junction temperature of around 100°C whilst other lighting solutions are at around two thousand degrees Celsius.

This means that for LED lighting, there needs to be an effective heat transfer path to the ambient air; a thermal design challenge to say the least. A better heat transfer path is normally proportional to the cost of the product. The heat sink performance can be greatly decreased by adding a fan, but that adds noise and an extra reliability concern to the product. The challenge is to provide a cooling solution which is just as cost effective whilst satisfying the LED thermal requirements.

How Small Can You Go?  
When designing LED cooling solutions, the size of the cooling solution can be directly related to the cost. A bigger heat sink means more weight and more material that has to be paid for. Optimization of a heat sink allows for the best possible performance for a given material cost. Natural convection heat sinks also have the benefit being more reliable than a fan cooled solution without the extra cost of the fan. Could simulation tools be used to accurately predict the junction temperatures of LEDs and reduced hot spots while minimizing the size of the overall lighting product?

The Solution Options  
ATS Europe used Future Facilities’ 6SigmaET simulation software to model the thermal performance of the lamp alongside analytical calculations and the eventual experimental measurements. Different configurations of printed circuit boards (PCB) were evaluated using the software. The configurations included FR4 and metal core board configurations. The models predicted that temperature drop across the PCB using the FR4 board configurations would be severe and preclude the use of a natural convection heat sink. After an optimized metal core board configuration was simulated, the heat sink size was determined by analytical methods and performance was confirmed with the software. The heat sink eventually was selected from ATS’ standard LED heat sink catalog. The heat sink design was optimized for a natural convection environment and coated with a highly efficient surface finish.

Download case study

 

future facilities,lighting industry,case study,lighting digest,www.lightingdigest.co.uk

 
 

Twitter